How to fix unknown UID 501 in iTERM?

How to fix unknown UID 501 in iTERM?

If you use iTerm 2 & macOS 10.13, please try command like ‘sudo ls’, it might be say “sudo: unknown uid 501: who are you”, you can restart iTerm can resolve this problem. This solved my problem @cuiweiqiang. I had the same issue as mentioned above.

Why is code build is failed while executing command?

Reason: exit status 127 – Stack Overflow code build is failed with Error while executing command: npm install. Reason: exit status 127 I created a code pipeline with very simple code and connected to codecommit. tried to build it but it is failing at codebuild step stating error executing npm install Am I missing something.

Is there a sudo command for iTerm 2?

The same situation before. If you use iTerm 2 & macOS 10.13, please try command like ‘sudo ls’, it might be say “sudo: unknown uid 501: who are you”, you can restart iTerm can resolve this problem. This solved my problem @cuiweiqiang.

How to stop exec 1 > file in Linux?

The first exec copies the original file descriptor 1 (standard output) to file descriptor 3, then redirects standard output to the named file. The second exec copies file descriptor 3 to standard output again, and then closes file descriptor 3. This is a bit open ended. It can be described at a C code level or at the shell command line level.

Why do I get error trying to exec’cc1plus’?

I had the same issue when forking with ‘python’; the main reason is that the search path is relative, if you don’t call g++ as /usr/bin/g++, it will not be able to work out the canonical paths to call cc1plus. You may have this issue as well if you have environment variable GCC_ROOT pointing to a wrong location.

Which is the correct way to use exec 1 file?

Q2: exec 1>file is a slightly more verbose way of doing exec >file which, as already stated, redirect stdout to the given file, provided you have the right to create/write it. The file is created if it doesn’t exist, it is truncated if it does. exec 1>&- is closing stdout, which is probably a bad idea in most situations.

Which is the equivalent of exec 1 > / dev / tty?

As I wrote, exec 1>/dev/tty and exec >/dev/tty are exactly equivalent so save one keystroke and use the latter. On the other hand, while exec >/dev/tty is portable, exec 1>/dev/pts/0 is not and happen to do the same in your experiment only by chance. That wouldn’t work with another terminal window and might not work either with a different machine.