Q&A

Can a company have an English only policy?

Can a company have an English only policy?

The EEOC has stated that rules requiring employees to speak only English in the workplace violate the law unless the employer can show that they are justified by business necessity. An English-only rule should be limited to the circumstances in which it is needed for the employer to operate safely or efficiently.

Which federal court decision ruled that an employer has the right to establish English only rules at the workplace?

The EEOC
The EEOC takes a more hostile view of English-only rules. Under its interpretation, any rule requiring employees to speak only English at all times in the workplace is presumed to violate Title VII.

Is there an English only policy in the workplace?

Employers should be careful they do not unwittingly create an English-only policy. This may occur if supervisors tell employees to speak English, even though the employer has no official policy requiring English. See Martinez v.

When to use an English-only rule at work?

A workplace English-only rule that is applied only at certain times may be adopted only under very limited circumstances that are justified by business necessity. 29 C.F.R. § 1606.7 (b) Such a rule must be narrowly tailored to address the business necessity. Situations in which business necessity would justify an English-only rule include:

Do you have to speak English in the workplace?

The prevailing opinion among courts that have addressed the issue is that rules requiring employees to speak English in the workplace do not violate Title VII if the employer has a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the rule and employees can comply with the rule.

What is the EEOC’s view of English only rules?

The EEOC takes a more hostile view of English-only rules. Under its interpretation, any rule requiring employees to speak only English at all times in the workplace is presumed to violate Title VII. Speak-English-Only Rules, 29 C.F.R. §1606.7 (a) (2006). it is applied only at certain times,

Employers should be careful they do not unwittingly create an English-only policy. This may occur if supervisors tell employees to speak English, even though the employer has no official policy requiring English. See Martinez v.

A workplace English-only rule that is applied only at certain times may be adopted only under very limited circumstances that are justified by business necessity. 29 C.F.R. § 1606.7 (b) Such a rule must be narrowly tailored to address the business necessity. Situations in which business necessity would justify an English-only rule include:

The prevailing opinion among courts that have addressed the issue is that rules requiring employees to speak English in the workplace do not violate Title VII if the employer has a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the rule and employees can comply with the rule.

The EEOC takes a more hostile view of English-only rules. Under its interpretation, any rule requiring employees to speak only English at all times in the workplace is presumed to violate Title VII. Speak-English-Only Rules, 29 C.F.R. §1606.7 (a) (2006). it is applied only at certain times,