What are two ways that judges are held accountable to citizens?
The phrase judicial accountability describes the view that judges should be held accountable in some way for their work. This could be public accountability—getting approval from voters in elections—or accountability to another political body like a governor or legislature.
What to do if the Judge is biased?
If the Judge makes a ruling in a court hearing that a guy feels is bias, then he should contact his attorney immediately to try to bring the matter back to court for a motion to set aside the order or appeal the ruling depending on the state’s rules of civil procedure.
Who oversees California judges?
Commission on Judicial Performance
The Commission on Judicial Performance, established in 1960, is the independent state agency responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct and judicial incapacity and for disciplining judges, pursuant to article VI, section 18 of the California Constitution.
Can you sue a judge in California?
Judges are typically immune from a lawsuit. You cannot sue judges for actions they took in their official capacity. For example, a judge who decides a case against you cannot be sued.
Who is the judge in the family court?
Family judge Stephen Wildblood (rear) with the cast of his play, which explores issues in the family courts. Photograph: Adrian Sherratt/The Guardian Family judge Stephen Wildblood (rear) with the cast of his play, which explores issues in the family courts.
Why do we need to know about closed family courts?
‘Campaigners want what goes on in closed family courts to be made more transparent so that the state can be held accountable for its actions beyond the single mechanism of the court of appeal, the barriers to which are high.’ Photograph: Alamy The play Who Cares?, comes in the context of increasingly urgent calls for greater scrutiny.
Is the family court a very harsh environment?
In an interactive post-performance discussion with the audience at the University of Gloucestershire, Wildblood acknowledges that family courts are brutal places. “It’s a very harsh environment,” he says. Among a generally reserved judiciary, family judges are particularly tight-lipped when it comes to engaging with the public.
Who are the campaigners for closed family courts?
Campaigners, including mothers, fathers, relatives, lawyers, journalists and members of parliament, want what goes on in closed family courts to be made more transparent so that the state can be held accountable beyond the single mechanism of the court of appeal, the barriers to which are high.
How are judges and lawyers cover for each other?
1. Lawyers and judges cover for each other. Most judges and lawyers will not report each other for misconduct or violations of judicial ethics. Judges especially can get away with bad behavior because lawyers don’t want to get on a judge’s bad side.
What are family law efforts underway in CFCC?
Family law efforts underway in CFCC include: In addition to assisting parents with information and resources for accessing the courts and resolving parenting disputes, both of these sites provide developmentally appropriate information for young children and teens.
What does the family and Juvenile Law Advisory Committee do?
CFCC provides staff to the Judicial Council’s advisory committees, including the Family and Juvenile Law Advisory Committee to help develop statewide rules of court and court forms that respond to changes in the law or requests for new or amended rules of court, forms, or standards of judicial administration.
Can a judge and a lawyer be friends?
Most judges and lawyers are friends outside the courtroom, especially if you live in a small community. Your lawyer knows the judge, his lawyer knows the judge and it is difficult for a judge to remain impartial if he is better buddies with one or the other of the lawyers.